Copper vs Stainless Counterflow Chillers: What Actually Matters
Copper conducts heat 25 times better than stainless, and it barely matters in a coil-in-coil chiller. Here is why, and why we build ours from 304 stainless anyway.
In this post
Ask ten brewers which chiller material is better and eight will say copper, because copper conducts heat better. That is true. It is also mostly beside the point in a counterflow chiller, and it hides the reasons you might not want copper touching your wort at all. Here is the honest comparison.
The conductivity argument
Copper conducts heat at roughly 400 W/m·K. 304 stainless manages about 16. On paper, copper wins by a mile. But the tube wall is not what limits heat transfer in a coil-in-coil chiller. The wall is thin, under a millimetre. The bottlenecks are the thin, sluggish layers of liquid sitting against each side of the wall, the boundary layers, and those depend on flow rate, turbulence and surface area, not on the metal.
Run the numbers for a ½" tube with wort on one side and water on the other and the wall accounts for a few percent of the total resistance to heat flow in copper, and maybe 15 to 20 percent in stainless. So a stainless chiller of the same length cools a little slower, not 25 times slower. And length is cheap to add. That is why our counterflow chiller is 30 feet of coil rather than the 12 to 16 feet common in copper units. The extra surface area more than pays back the conductivity gap, and you throttle the outlet valve to get whatever exit temperature you want anyway.
Where copper loses
Corrosion
Wort is acidic, around pH 5.2, and hot. Copper in hot acidic liquid slowly dissolves. Leave a copper coil wet and it grows the blue-green oxide layer you have seen on old plumbing. Some brewers scrub it off with vinegar before every brew, which is a chore, and some leave it, which is a problem. Stainless forms a passive chromium-oxide skin that reforms on its own. It does not care about wort.
Cleaning chemicals
The alkaline brewery cleaners that make a chiller easy to maintain, PBW and its cousins, are hard on copper with repeated use. Chlorinated sanitizers and bleach pit it. Acid-based sanitizers like Star San are fine on both, but the strong caustic cycle that actually removes dried hop resin from a tube is one you should not run through copper every brew. With a stainless chiller you back-flush hot caustic for twenty minutes, rinse, and it is done.
Flavour and yeast
Trace copper is a yeast nutrient and helps scrub sulphur compounds, which is the reason old copper kettles get a nostalgic mention. Above a few tenths of a part per million it is toxic to yeast and gives beer a metallic edge. A clean, passivated copper coil contributes very little; a corroded one contributes more than you want. Stainless contributes nothing, which is what most of us want from a chiller.
Lifespan and fittings
Copper chillers are usually soldered or brazed to hose barbs and garden-hose fittings, with a plastic or brass shell. Stainless units, at least ours, are welded 304 inside and out, with 1.5" tri-clamp ends that clamp straight onto a pump, a kettle or a fermenter. There is no solder to fail, no barb to split a hose, and nothing to replace.
Where copper wins
Price, and speed per foot. A copper immersion chiller is the cheapest way to cool wort, full stop, and if you are brewing five gallons in a kettle on a burner with no pump it is a fine tool. A short copper counterflow chiller will also outperform an equally short stainless one. The trade is that you buy the short chiller twice, once now and once when the fittings or the coating give up.
The hybrid option
Some chillers use a copper inner tube with a stainless outer jacket, so the wort sees copper and the exterior looks like stainless. You get the corrosion and cleaning-chemical issues on the side that matters and the price of stainless on the side that does not. We looked at building one and did not. If you want to see how a 16-foot copper hybrid compares to a 30-foot all-stainless coil in practice, read our side-by-side with the Spike chiller.
Quick comparison
| Copper | 304 stainless | |
|---|---|---|
| Heat transfer per foot | Better | Slightly lower, fixed with length |
| Corrosion in wort | Slow, ongoing | None |
| Caustic cleaning | Limited | Unlimited |
| Chlorinated sanitizers | Avoid | Rinse well, otherwise fine |
| Flavour contribution | Small, grows with corrosion | None |
| Fittings | Barbs, garden hose, solder | Tri-clamp, welded |
| Price | Lower | Higher |
| Expected life | Years | Decades |
What we build and why
Every Bräu Supply system ships with, or can add, the same all-stainless 30-foot counterflow chiller. Inner and outer tube are both 304. It clamps onto a Unibräu, a BräuPro, a HERMS or any tri-clamp kettle, and you clean it by pumping hot cleaner through it backwards. The only maintenance it needs is a hot rinse and a back-flush.
If you are still deciding, the how-to is here: how to hook up, run and clean a counterflow chiller.